Plagiarism by AI is still plagiarism

This post has been read 66 times!

October 27, 2025- by Steven Greer

I understand the concept of plagiarism and why it is bad. Therefore, if I post something on Twitter and it has been drafted by Grok AI, I will credit Grok as the source. If I contributed greatly, I will cite both Grok and myself.

However, we are living in an age of unethical scumbags pervading our degraded society. Western mores (i.e. cultural norms) are eroded. Almost nobody realizes that using AI is cheating and plagiarism. If somebody passes off an AI document as their own, that is plagiarism. Just because a computer did it does not mean it is not plagiarism.

This is an important concept. We are currently at the early stage of AI adoption and the risks and downsides are being ignored. An employee or student looks smart for using AI to get work done quickly. They are not scorned as cheats and frauds.

I had a disturbing interaction over the weekend with delusional schizophrenic (caused by amphetamines) who has fooled the highest levels of government. He portrays himslef as a victim of the deep state because he was a whistleblower. In fact, he is just an anarchist. Tucker Carlson gave him two hours of platform. So, I contacted him.

This nut fancies himself to be some AI expert (among many other things in his delusions). He was proud of making seven different legal complaints using AI and then serving them to the heads of the government. He said to me, “Kash Patel has one sitting on his desk right now” He also drafted a lengthy cover letter for JP Morgan created by AI (while high on ADHD drugs).

In addition to this being plagiarism, using AI to create written produces very bad results that must be corrected by a human with real intelligence. However, the students, lawyers, and employees using AI lack that capability because they are lazy and dumb. They have turned over the entire process to machines.

In high schools and colleges, millions of kids now believe it is perfectly acceptable to use AI to produce written work that is supposed to have been generated by their brains. They have absolutely no sense of right and wrong because of the decades of degradation of our schools. They do not understand the concept of lying and fraud.

We are going to see this over the next few months snowball. The AI problem in courts is upon us now. There are thousands of pro se litigants and many more really lazy lawyers who think that AI will be able to draft briefs for them. We have two federal judges doing it right now.

The legal profession had better get in front of this really quickly. Every judge or clerk should be screening filings for signs of AI. Every party should have to file an affidavit at the beginning of the case that they will not use AI. PACER should require a pledge before filing anything. Then, people need to be sent to jail if they violate the above.

The Copyright office is going to have a big problem as well. Coincidentally, I just got a book copyrighted. There was a human scouring over my book in a very paranoid way looking for AI-generated work. She accused me of using AI when I had not. It was bizarre. Well, at least they are aware of the problem.

If a written work is created by anyone other than the person claiming to be the author, it is plagiarism. If machine intelligence created it, it is still plagiarism.

This entry was posted in - Op-Ed, Law, Propaganda, Hollywood, and News Essays, TechLash Essays. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *