This post has been read 50 times!
March 25, 2026- by Steven Greer
There has been a big development in the battle to protect the First Amendment. The case of Missouri v. Biden[1] has resulted in a consent decree agreement to prevent the government from pressuring social media to censor voices. The judge needs to review it and decide whether or not to approve it.
However, that case is almost moot now, because the new form of censorship involves using AI non-human algorithms embedded within social media operating systems to do the dirty work automatically. In 2024, I interviewed the leading plaintiff in Missouri v. Biden, a doctor named Aaron Kheriaty, and we predicted this would happen (see Part 5).
Also, fake social media accounts and the recruiting of Trojan horse podcasters to carry the water for the deep state have become part of the censorship apparatus. Chase Hughes (a leading behavior profiling and persuasion expert who is a retired US military trainer who developed the NCI system for intelligence agencies) explained how it all works (I know that he is probably just limited hangout and manipulating us, but he is saying correct things).
Here, he explains how media stooges are given instructions by the CIA and Mossad to control content. If someone like me is thwarting their propaganda efforts, they will be told unofficially, via text or phone call, something like, “Hey, I do not think you should have that guy on your show”.
This is what happened to me several times. I have been the most censored man alive for almost two decades.
First, when I was still with legacy media Fox, around 2012, I started to get the cold shoulder from producers. I had written two op-eds in the WSJ critical of Obamacare. I tried to track down the source of my blacklisting through my producer Jake Novak and we figured out who it was. (By the way, Jake, who produced for Larry Kudlow, disappeared after President Trump was elected in 2016. I tried to track them down and there was no trace. I recently learned that he had become an operative of Mossad.)
Then, after the Covid pandemic broke out in January 2020, I became a big sensation in New York radio media. I was so good that WABC was going to give me my own show. After a few months of the lifting of my decade-long backlisting, like a light switch, it all ended. Somebody from the deep state told WABC not to have me on.
Rudy Giuliani, who was on WABC, was a good friend of mine. He felt guilty about WABC cutting me off unjustly and called me a month or so later trying to mend bridges. It was too late. I had already sued him in the SDNY and 2nd Cir. (Greer v. Fox News, No. 22-1970 (2d Cir. 2023).
It also happened with the Joe Piscopo Show. He has a weak producer who stopped having me on the show around the same time as the WABC blacklisting. Joe Piscopo, like Rudy Giuliani, knew it was wrong and had me on the show a few months later. But we both knew it was creepy and that was the last time I was ever on his show.
With both Rudy Giuliani and Joe Piscopo, they were men over the age of 60, who had become very successful and were not easily susceptible to these pressuring tactics. They reluctantly went along with it and then showed remorse. However, if anyone chooses to work in the field of media, they will be forced to go along with this propaganda and censorship. It is unavoidable.
So, that is how Steven Greer became the most censored man alive. The legacy media, and now fake podcasters, just get a call from some deep state handler who says “Hey, do not have that guy on your show.”
Of note, the same thing happened to Leslie Manookian, former Wall Street executive, documentary filmmaker, and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund who led opposition to COVID vaccine mandates and Warp Speed. She told me a story of her traveling across country to be on a national morning TV show, only to get canceled at the last minute.
It all brings up a new legal concept that I am on the forefront of litigating. I am suing Tucker Carlson (Greer v. Carlson, No. S295235 (Cal. Sup. Ct. petition for review filed Feb. 24, 2026, from Cal. Ct. App. No. B343596) who secretly gets paid by foreign state actors, which makes him a lobbyist. The Wall Street Journal published an article about how podcasters paid by state spy agencies are violating lobbying laws.
As a rule of thumb, any podcast you see with a big following is almost certainly being paid secretly by some sleazy state agency. Conversely, anyone who has powerful information and a good ability to explain it will be censored.
Related are several recent incidents across the United States of local police acting like the Fourth Reich fascists in the U.K. In Oakland County, Michigan, Sheriff Michael Bouchard publicly highlighted the arrest of a Wisconsin man for posting a meme portraying the sheriff as a “puppet of Israel.” In Bell County, Texas, police visited the home of Navy veteran Adam Pires because of his online comments criticizing Israel and the Jewish community. In Miami Beach, Florida, detectives knocked on activist Raquel Pacheco’s door over her Facebook criticism of the mayor’s strong support for Israel. At the University of Florida, administrators deactivated the College Republicans chapter after an off-campus social media post involving Nazi salutes was cited as antisemitic conduct.
Taken together, these episodes highlight a pattern in which criticism of Israel or related imagery triggers swift official attention. While authorities often cite concerns over rising antisemitism and potential threats, the absence of arrests or charges in most cases, combined with ongoing lawsuits alleging viewpoint discrimination, underscores the tension between legitimate public-safety interests and the bedrock constitutional protection of even offensive or unpopular speech. Such actions risk normalizing the idea that certain perspectives on foreign policy or ethnic politics lie beyond the pale of ordinary First Amendment safeguards.
Making news today is the landmark case of Missouri v. Biden, which went all the way to the Supreme Court only to be rejected on a procedural ground of “lack of standing” by the plaintiffs. It has been pending in the district court in Louisiana for two years. The Trump administration has now settled with the plaintiffs, and a major Consent Decree is ready to be signed.
Senator Schmitt, who launched the case when he was Attorney General of Missouri, tweeted that it was a big victory. However, it is not, sadly. It is a fake consent decree, essentially, meant for show. It literally applies only to the two individual plaintiffs remaining (Aaron Kheriaty is one of them). That is how powerful is this deep state. They first got the Supreme Court to avoid ruling on a flagrant First Amendment violation. Now, they have prevented the lower court from doing its job by presenting to the judge a sham consent decree.
(Figure: Posted by Senator Schmitt)
The original plaintiff can be blamed here too. The current Director of the National Institutes of Health (and acting Director of the CDC), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, removed his name from the lawsuit. A similar identical case led by Bobby Kennedy, who is now the Secretary of Health and Human Services, was also dropped. RFK Jr. filed Kennedy v. Biden, 3:23-cv-00381 (W.D. La.), in 2023, but he personally withdrew as a plaintiff in February 2025 and allowed the case to die (note, this author is involved in that case through a motion to intervene).
These two high-profile figures campaigned into office as fierce defenders of free speech. They now appear to be bending the knee to the deep state.
The easiest and most obvious target for reform by the HHS would be the deeply corrupted medical journals. Yet they have done nothing meaningful about it. Industry and the deep state still use the journals as propaganda outlets. No editor has been held accountable for fake articles that killed people after 2020.
The deep state holds compromising dirt on almost everyone. We now live in an age of sanctimonious false outrage where even minor indiscretions can destroy lives. Very few people have the courage or integrity to rise above it.
The First Amendment is the bedrock of the US Constitution, and yet it is not being enforced even as the government violates it egregiously and wantonly. We are living in a Post-Constitutional United States of America.
[1] Missouri v. Biden, 680 F. Supp. 3d 727 (W.D. La. 2023) (preliminary injunction ruling by Judge Doughty), then Fifth Circuit: Missouri v. Biden, 83 F.4th 350 (5th Cir. 2023) (affirmed in part, reversed in part, modified the injunction), then Supreme Court: Murthy v. Missouri, 603 U.S. 43 (2024)