Big Pharma’s bag of statistical tricks used to get vaccines approved

This post has been read 523 times!

October 8, 2021- by Steven E. Greer, MD

I was the first one a month ago to blast a story with the headline “Vaccines no longer work. Period.” Keep that in mind please.

Yesterday, Pfizer announced their expedited plan to receive approval for their COVID vaccine in young kids. I believe the reason Pfizer rushed this data attempting approval for use in 5-to-11-year-olds is that they see the window of opportunity closing fast. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is ending and the bad safety data are becoming too hard to hide. So, they are trying one last-ditch effort, hoping the communists in the White House will overrule the FDA panel that will vote them down.

Meanwhile, I just learned that this much hyped “95% efficacy” data that came out under Trump during “warp speed” was BS. I did not bother to look into the data at the time. Big-Pharma is using a common ploy of “relative risk”, per The Lancet. The actual reduction in risk to getting the virus after you take the vaccines was only about 1%.

For 20 years as an analyst, one of my main jobs has been to debunk junk science. The drug industry uses the same handful of statistical ploys. One of them is this relative risk scam. For example, the sad reality is that the vast majority of cancer drugs don’t do a damn thing. They reduce tumor growth a little bit and do nothing for survival. But Big Pharma always hypes the efficacy by using relative risk. So, it is of no surprise that they are using relative risk again.

However, under this pandemic, they have pushed the envelope of junk science further. The data they are submitting to the FDA is like nothing I have ever seen before. They are trying to get drugs approve that literally have no data to support their approval, which is the case for the vaccines in kids.

The Pfizer data in kids only shows that antibodies were detectable after inoculation, but there is no eveidence to show that vaccinated kids were safer from the virus. That is because the outcome required to be measured, i.e., illness in kids, is so rare that they could never recruit enough patients.

Moreover, antibodies are in no way a surrogate for reduction in “COVID” risk. As we know, the mutated virus is not being neutralized by the vaccine antibodies to the spike protein. The only thing the spike proteins generated by the vaccines do is harm the human cells.



This entry was posted in - Op-Ed, - Politics, Doctors, Dentists, Federal government, Health and lifestyle, Political Essays, Propaganda, Hollywood, and News Essays, Schools, Wall Street, Wall Street and Real Estate Essays. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *