This post has been read 78 times!
October 26, 2025- by Steven Greer
Here is an exclusive: Fake AI-written legal complaints have been served to FBI Director Kash Patel and other cabinet members.
Just 20 days ago, Senator Grassley’s Finance Committee called out two federal judges who are using artificial intelligence to draft briefs that were full of errors. AI is nowhere near ready to be used for legal work. I know from my own experience that AI will flat out fabricate case law. It’s not a mistake. It’s trained to lie. It also does not have the intelligence to properly write a brief.
Well, I had a very bizarre experience last night with a person who has recently featured on Tucker Carlson. To make a long story short, he is literally delusional and manic from drugs. He thinks he is a government spy when he is not. He thinks he has legal skills when he does not.
He was telling me how he had served seven different lawsuits to high-level cabinet officials like Kash Patel. I know that would be an impossible amount of work for one person to do. I called him out and he admitted that he used AI to draft them. He also used AI that evening to draft a several-page detailed cover letter to JP Morgan trying to get a job. The letter is just gibberish. This man is proud of doing this too. He thinks that he is some AI expert who is being smart by generating complex briefs quickly, but he is too stupid to realize that he’s generating garbage.
We are going to see this over the next few months snowball. The AI problem in courts is upon us now. There are thousands of pro se litigants and many more really lazy lawyers who think that AI will be able to draft briefs for them. We have two federal judges doing it right now.
The legal profession had better get in front of this really quickly. Every judge or clerk should be screening filings for signs of AI. Every party should have to file an affidavit at the beginning of the case that they will not use AI. PACER should require a pledge before filing anything. Then, people need to be sent to jail if they violate the above.
The Copyright office is going to have a big problem as well. Coincidentally, I just got a book copyrighted. There was a human scouring over my book in a very paranoid way looking for AI-generated work. She accused me of using AI when I had not. It was bizarre. Well, at least they are aware of the problem.
If a written work is created by anyone other than the person claiming to be the author, it is plagiarism. If machine intelligence created it, it is still plagiarism.