This post has been read 843 times!
August 20, 2024- by Steven E. Greer
Bobby Kennedy has his own injunction against the federal government barring them from censoring social media. The Murthy v. Missouri and Missouri v. Biden cases got all of the attention at SCOTUS. Few know about this Kennedy injunction.
The court just ruled that Kennedy has standing. Here is the Order.
Therefore, it is illegal for your X.com account to be throttled, for Amazon to digitally burn books critical of Tony Fauci, or for Google to censor searches of Republicans, if they are doing it in collusion with the federal government.
When Amazon recently removed my books in a digital book burning move, I motioned to join the Kennedy case to get injunctive relief. The judge denied it, citing it might slow down the case. He also ruled that I am “adequately represented” now by Kennedy’s lawyers.
August 26, 2024-
- Mark Zuckerberg just admitted three things: 1. Biden-Harris Admin “pressured” Facebook to censor Americans. 2. Facebook censored Americans. 3. Facebook throttled the Hunter Biden laptop story. Big win for free speech.
September 12, 2024-
Appropriately, on September 11th, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals stayed the injunction Bobby Kennedy earned that required the White House to cease and desist from censoring social media. This is timely because it was 9-11-2001 that created the Patriot Act, which destroyed our Bill of Rights.
Recall, State AG’s got an injunction in Missouri v. Biden, but then the compromised and corrupted Supreme Court stayed that. However, off the radar and little reported was that Kennedy had an identical injunction that survived. Well, no more.
This is crucial because it allows the deep state to rig the elections with impunity. We know for a fact that they withheld crucial information before the 2020 election on Hunter Biden and many other issues. Mark Zuckerberg recently admitted it too. Will Elon Musk have the ability to resist this and keep X a free speech platform?
The good news is that the stay is only until the appeal over the issue of Kennedy’s standing is determined. Well, as stated above, the Supreme Court specifically referenced this and Kennedy has standing according to one SCOTUS Justice.
Nevertheless, it seems that this meaningless “standing” technicality is being used as a pretext for the court to blink and capitulate to the deep state before the election. We are in a post-constitutional country, folks. First, SCOTUS refused to defend the First Amendment in Murthy v. Missouri. Now, the normally conservative 5th Cir. has has well.